To accept that BlueScope’s campaign to put its price list under the noses of steel manufacturers in Taiwan and India, as well as Australian steel distributors, was nothing more than a lawful but failed sales strategy was an “evisceration” of competition law, Hodge said.
“The essence of the defence is that, yes, Ellis wanted to raise the price of the product, but what he was seeking to achieve was to have these people do what he wanted them to do, but not commit to what he wanted them to do,” Hodge told the court in August.
‘Nobody can bear a $10 million fine or 10 years’ in prison.′
Unidentified Yieh Phui manager
The issue of Ellis’s intentions has made the only recorded evidence of his contested interactions central to the case.
In the Taiwan recording, Ellis tells Yieh Phui executives that because BlueScope had an 85 per cent market share in Australia, the price list merely established “a market norm.” But Ellis then goes on to say that “it’s not compulsory to follow this — you can follow or not follow it.“
This is when the Yieh Phui managers in the recording start to sound worried. They are clear about the penalties linked to Australia’s 2009 criminal-cartel law and the willingness of the ACCC to investigate price-fixing arrangements.
“Again, we focus on the spirit of the ACCC’s [rules requiring] an unrestricted market, without any limitations,” an unidentified Yieh Phui manager says in the recording. “Nobody can bear a $10 million fine or 10 years’ in prison.”
Ellis attempts to reassure them. The price list was “perfectly acceptable in Australia,” he tells the Taiwanese. “There is absolutely no illegality about that. Please believe me that before I had this conversation, my lawyer talked to me.“
That a group of managers, thousands of kilometres from Australia, would be so familiar with the country’s antitrust laws should have sounded alarm bells for BlueScope.
In evidence presented to the court, we now know that a BlueScope competitor had been in touch with the Taiwanese executives to warn them of the perils of Ellis’s pitch. At least one of two other local steel companies, Shang Shing and China Steel, had also been warned.
Enforcer under pressure
Despite the recording of the Taiwan meeting, the ACCC has repeatedly found itself on the back foot since the civil lawsuit was announced in 2019.
By its own admission, the ACCC had wanted this to be a criminal-cartel prosecution, something that is reflected by its approach to the investigation and the documents it prepared.
For reasons that remain unclear, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions declined to pursue the matter. This left the ACCC scrambling to file a civil lawsuit within the allowed five-year window.
The ACCC then attempted to suppress reporting of the civil lawsuit before a parallel criminal-obstruction prosecution against Ellis had been resolved.
Finished coils of rolled steel at BlueScope’s Port Kembla steelworks in NSW.Credit:Bloomberg
But O’Bryan rejected the ACCC’s request following a legal challenge by The Age and Sydney Morning Herald, saying the threshold for the suppression of legal proceedings was high and the ACCC had failed to clear it. In September 2020, Ellis’s obstruction prosecution culminated in a guilty plea, marking Australia’s first criminal-obstruction conviction in a competition case.
Liquid dinner
The reliability of the ACCC’s witnesses has also been called into question. The recollections of Malcolm Griffith Wright, known as “Griff,” were repeatedly impugned by lawyers for the defence, who managed to obtain an itemised bill of Wright’s 2013 dinner with Ellis.
Wright, the manager of Victoria-based Wright Steel, met Ellis at the No. 8 restaurant in Melbourne’s Crown Casino complex, with BlueScope’s Matthew Hennessy also present. The table ordered four Bombay Sapphire gins, a Lord Nelson beer, a $115 bottle of wine and three orders of Highland Park Scotch. Defence lawyers said Ellis didn’t drink — leaving Wright and Hennessy to account for the alcohol intake.
Barrister Cameron Moore, representing BlueScope, suggested to Wright that those drinks may have affected his recollection of a dinner that took place eight years ago. “I make no criticism — it seems like a pretty standard dinner,” Moore said.
In response, the ACCC depicted Ellis, the son of mining giant BHP Billiton’s former chairman Jerry Ellis, as unreliable and his evidence as flying in the face of all logic.
How could it be that Ellis, or anyone else from BlueScope, thought it was a good idea to visit competitors in both Asia and Australia with a price list in hand? “Why would they have any interest in doing that?” Hodge asked the court.
But Ruth Higgins, representing Ellis, said that the judge should focus not on whether visiting rivals was a smart move, but whether it amounted to an attempt to establish a price-fixing arrangement.
“It is not sufficient that his conduct was imprudent or unwise — your honour might conclude both. But your honour has to find specific intention to bring about an arrangement,” Higgins said.
Laurel Henning and James Panichi are Australian-based reporters for LexisNexis’ MLex.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.
